You get awesome functionality like cp --reflink and btrfs subvolume snapshot -r and btrfs send and btrfs receive . Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. If you're truly after space with no redundancy then you might as well go RAID0 or no raid at all with only two drives. Delay allocation. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. Increased Performance of ext4 vs. I've seen benchmarks (eg: this one) that put btrfs considerably slower than ext4. This is just an additional protection. ext4 with m=0 ext4 with m=0 and T=largefile4 xfs with crc=0 mounted them with: defaults,noatime defaults,noatime,discard defaults,noatime results show really no difference between first two, while plotting 4 at a time: time is around 8-9 hours. Sun Microsystems originally created it as part of its Solaris operating system. Dropping performance in case with 4 threads for ext4 is a signal that there still are contention issues. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. A execução do comando quotacheck em um sistema de. 2. Approach 1: Build your own kernel, and tweak it's build config to pre-link btrfs. The BTRFS RAID is not difficult at all to create or problematic, but up until now, OMV does not support BTRFS RAID creation or management through the webGUI, so you have to use the terminal. Choosing between them can be difficult as each has its own advantages and disadvantages. For zfs there is a plugin. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems, including ZFS On Linux. It supports large file systems and provides excellent scalability and reliability. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Both Btrfs and Ext4 have their own advantages. Btrfs uses Copy-on-Write (COW), a resource management technique where a. It supports all. Ext4 has journaling on by default, and new users likely won’t know how to disable it to save read/writes on their SSDs. Both are suitable for everyday use, but it's worth noting that ext4 partitions. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. Usable space isn't a big issue but I don't want to lose half with RAID 10. . というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. Abstract and Figures. 0 Intel Skylake 16384MB Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB LLVMpipe Realtek ALC1150 Intel Connection Ubuntu 16. Ext4 file system is an ideal choice. 가능. Overview of File Systems in Linux. Hello everyone, I can't choose proper filesystem between XFS, ZFS (OpenZFS), BTRFS, F2FS and EXT4. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. Precisely, it seems to be 50%. EXT4 is very low-hassle, normal journaled filesystem. Compression is usually not very efficient on game data (that is already compressed) and can increase fragmentation. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. org. wbeater • 3 yr. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). 4 EXT4 / XFS / Btrfs RAID Performance On Four HDDs Storage : 2019-12-28: Benchmarking The Experimental Bcachefs File-System Against Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS & ZFS Storage : 2019-06-25: Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: Linux 5. . XFS is special because it supports massive file systems, with file sizes of up to 8 exabytes supported. It was later developed for Linux. . ZFS certainly can provide higher levels of growth and resiliency vs ext4/xfs. But according to tests in all scenarios, XFS is better than EXT4, it's a pity that there are no tests in games. You can see several XFS vs ext4 benchmarks on phoronix. I would stick with ext4 for the OS. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext (Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS File Systems Perhaps these types of file systems are strange or unknown to you, normal, since they are used in the environment of servers, NAS and Linux systems in general. Not a ton of bells and whistles, but they Just Work. 📽️ Abonnez-vous : Devenir membre VIP : et se former à #Linux, voici ce que je vous propose dans cet. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. While RAID 5 and 6 can be compared to RAID Z. repeat with all candidate filesystems in my case it was ext3, XFS, ReiserFS and JFS. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. Let’s go through the different features of the two filesystems. BTRFS. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. A Red Hat training course is available for RHEL 8. Yves Trudeau. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. the COW which saves alot of space and increases the speed. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. The only realistic benchmark is the one done on a real application in real conditions. On the other hand, backup of xfs to xfs allows you certain features that. Edit: I managed to save the two NTFS HDDs with chkdsk, but the exFAT drive just didn't wanna play ball. 10. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Because of that, the Ext4 file system is very stable. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. EXT4 is better for small files and day to day use. Btrfs trails the other options for a database in terms of latency and throughput. checksum verification on each file. The only concern I have is performance, maybe btrfs in a HDD will be really slow. 這裡有 4 個關於 EXT4 和 Btrfs 的附加問題。在這裡查看答案。 1. I've compiled in tmpfs for over a decade now. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. Checksumming, along with copy-on-write, provides the key method of ensuring file system integrity after unexpected power loss. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. Btrfs vs. LVM has snapshots. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. But timeshift reports (maybe due to different sizes of the combined btrfs) as reported in my initial. EXT4: Alternative File Systems for Linux Operating Systems. 3. Installing and booting with BTRFS has its advantages too. 4. The Ext4 file system is a very old file system and it has been used on the Linux operating system for a long, long time. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Ext4 is the default system for most Distros. BtrFS is still very experimental and is not recommended for a production server or desktop environment. ext4 or XFS are otherwise good options if you back up your config. Phoronix: Linux 4. "Open-source" is the primary reason people pick Btrfs over the competition. Btrfs is a more modern file system, introduced in 2007. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. The reason that Ext4 is often recommended is that it is the most used and trusted filesystem out there on Linux today. are two different decisions you have to make. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. Most distros continue to default to ext4. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. 2. To reserve an external journal with a specified size when you create an XFS file system, specify the -l logdev=device,size=size option to the mkfs. For btrfs you have to do most from CLI. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. , power failure) could be acceptable. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. A maximum partition size of the btrfs file system is 16 exbibytes, as well as maximum file size is 16 exbibytes too. It would be interesting to see a new benchmark result of CoW filesystems BTRFS vs ZFS in real world 2022. After conversion I: enabled compression. 0 File-System. Though personally I'd still go with ext4 primarily because despite recognizing some potential benefits of btrfs, I really don't see them as important for how I use my computers. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe. EXT4 has entirely different design goals, none of which are data integrity. The XFS File System. Small to Medium Enterprises: While ext3 suffices for businesses with modest data needs, scalability visionaries would do well considering ext4. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. ago. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both. Btrfs, EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and NILFS2 were tested on a Linux 5. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. 0 and particularly with F2FS seeing fixes as a result of it being picked up by Google for support on Pixel devices, I was curious to see. EXT4 es el sistema de archivos más utilizado en sistemas operativos basados en Linux, este sistema de. . So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. - Linux Kernel 5. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. Because ext4 can't beat btrfs when it comes to snapshot/delete. We’ll go over each file system in more detail ahead. In Windows NTFS is used, while in Mac OS it is HFS, perhaps these will sound familiar to you, especially the typical FAT or its variants for. 1. In a few words, I just need a really reliable and fast filesystem for years ahead, with the care of SSD in mind, I need it mostly for gaming, video-audio production, working with a lot of small/medium files (from 100-500Kb to 100-150Gb) sending them. I have 6 disks so I have created 3 logical disks, 2 SSDs each - just for testing. Mount the partition and test the conversion by checking the files. I've read and have anecdotally (not scientific and could be affected by other things) experienced Btrfs being slower than ext4. Linux provides the statx(2) system call interface for retrieving the file birth time for filesystems that support it since kernel version 4. xfs with ftype=1, ext4: fuse-overlayfs: any filesystem: devicemapper: direct-lvm: btrfs: btrfs: zfs: zfs: vfs: any filesystem: Other. , power failure) could be acceptable. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. However, Ext3 lacks advanced file system features like extent blocking mapping, dynamic allocation inode, and defragmentation. BTRFS solves all the problems I had so far: supports online resizing - both extending and shrinking. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. yield a very fast imaging backup. Personal data is irreplaceable. User quotas for each shared folder. 7 - EXT4 vs. An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix has published Linux filesystem benchmarks comparing XFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems. ext4. Обзор Ext4 vs Btrfs vs XFS. Language: Format: Language and Page Formatting Options. From some of the recent Linux kernel patches, it seems some of the most popular Linux file systems, Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS), B-Tree Filesystem (Btrfs), and fourth extended filesystem. . Its OS comes with only one by default (mostly it’s NTFS, FAT 32, or HFS). Compared to ext4, XFS has unlimited inode allocation, advanced allocation hinting (if you need it) and, in recent version, reflink support (but they need. Each of these file systems has its own way of. It does its job well. After much reading on ReFS, Btrfs, & ZFS, I've decided to run all 3 🤷♂️(Did the same with Seagate vs. ) TL, DR: All 3 major next gen CoW file systems have their advantages and drawbacks, and I figure integrating them into my workflow is the only way to fairly evaluate them see how they work for myself. Regarding filesystems. 10 4. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. But again, there's no real point in going with btrfs if only using two drives. It can hold up to 1 billion terabytes of data. (2013) compared the performance of Btrfs against XFS and ext4. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. This is the number of data disks times the number of blocks per. The total throughput is better than with ZFS (40k vs 60k), but the jitter is more severe. XFS and ext4 aren't that different. Both timeshift and borg write to it. Rep: XFS has unbalanced performance, but in the best use case blows away many other formats. XFS는 1993년 Silicon Graphics에서 개발한 고성능의 64bit 저널링. No ext4, você pode ativar cotas ao criar o sistema de arquivo ou mais tarde em um sistema de arquivo existente. It's stable and time-proven. On lower thread counts, it’s as much as 50% faster than EXT4. The NTFS support was powered by FUSE. 500GB HDD formatted as NTFS for luks containers. F2FS vs. XFS and btrfs are two advanced file systems for Linux that offer significant improvements over ext4. Otherwise, I don't think you'd notice the performance difference. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. Ability to shrink filesystem. (當然另一種做法是新增硬碟, 另外格式化為 btrfs. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. Ext4 and XFS are both great for "I need a filesystem, to store files, on this drive". XFS vs Ext4. Optane SSD RAID Performance With ZFS On Linux, EXT4, XFS, Btrfs, F2FS Storage : 2019-06-20: FreeBSD ZFS vs. EXT4 is better in the general case. . Ext4 vs ext3. . Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. 6. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. Edit: fsdump / fsrestore means the corresponding system backup and restore to for that file system. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. 7. XFS supports larger file sizes and. 3TB HDD formatted as NTFS for main files. Each of these file systems has its own way of organizing data, merits, and demerits. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. Journaling ensures file system integrity after system crashes (for example, due to power outages) by keeping a record of file system. Bcachefs is a copy-on-write (COW) file system for Linux-based operating systems. It is a copy-on-write (CoW) filesystem supporting. for the home lab you can use ext4 it is fast an flexible: grow and shrink are supported. BTRFS, ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 File Systems – Complete Comparison. ZoL Performance, Ubuntu ZFS On Linux Reference Storage : 2019-04-24: Linux 5. BTRFS VS EXT4 performance in Raid 1. F2FS vs. The use of checksums in Btrfs can prevent silent data corruption. Note that while these tests are not indicative of real-world performance, we can extrapolate these results and use this as one reason. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). EXT4, Btrfs, and XFS were tested on the Ubuntu mainline kernel PPA hosted Linux 3. It uses a default file system for Linux distribution, including Debian and Ubuntu. 5. F2FS vs. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. In the future, Linux distributions will gradually shift towards BtrFS. Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 20 January 2018. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. EXT2/3/4: Extended Filesystem is by far the most popular filesystem among Linux desktop installations. The ext FilesystemsBtrfs also has snapshots so you can revert back to an earlier snapshot easily, say you run arch and some update borks your system (highly unlikely), you can simply revert back to the last good snapshot. ZFS does have advantages for handling data corruption (due to data checksums and scrubbing) - but unless you're spreading the data between multiple disks, it will at most tell you "well, that file's corrupted, consider it gone now". 1 million iops for ext4, right in line with the spec of the drive times 2,. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Files less than ~2KiB can be stored in the metadata section (“inline” in the b-tree nodes), so as not to waste most of a block. 重新定义 btrfs 文件系统大小 6. Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS were tested in their out-of-the-box state / default mount options. Be sure to change the /etc/fstab to reflect the change ( type to btrfs and fs_passno [the last field] to 0 as Btrfs does not do a file system check on boot). Also, on ZFS, in Linux, it takes some tweaking to get it performing good, so I would suggest to go btrfs or XFS. Btrfs is one of the most popular newly created file systems, and was. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. 2 See what others are saying What is btrfs? Btrfs, which stands for B-tree file system, is a modern and advanced file system that supports many features, such as snapshots, compression,. We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. I developed an application recently and compared the I/O performance of both and found ext4 to be slightly quicker for my application which was really just opening and reading whole files into memory. 7. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. ext4 was supposed to be a stop gap until a better Linux filesystem came along. The XFS file system is loved in the Linux community for its ability to handle and manage significant. This process have two main steps: 1. For example, my virtualization server is currently hyper-v and I use ReFS instead of NTFS for features like bitrot protection, checksums, ect. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. ZFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS file systems File systems like ZFS, EXT4, and BTRFS may seem strange or. The 12,3 % reduction in compilation time with BtrFS is a nice improvement but pales compared to the 58,4 % reduction seen with Ext4 on the same hardware doing the same task. EXT4 lacks more robust features but is stable and well-supported on all Linux operating systems. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. Una vez que hemos conocido las principales características de EXT4, vamos a hablar sobre Btrfs, el que se conoce como sucesor natural del sistema de archivos EXT4. After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and. The arguments about ext4 vs NTFS have been raging online for decades now. I used XFS until I managed to corrupt my partition table (my fault not XFS'). In this episode of the CyberGizmo I benchmark the 4 filesystems chosen by Phoronix for his testing and use my own workloads to compare and contrast them. 和 ext4 和 XFS 一起使用的工具比较 法律通告 Settings Close. This includes workload that creates or deletes large numbers of small files in a single thread. The Ext4 file system is mainly used on Linux, while the NTFS file system is commonly used on Windows, and the HFS+ file system is suitable for macOS. I understand that btrfs have a major problem with Raid, - and that is a problem. Ext4: cũng giống như Ext3, lưu giữ được những ưu điểm và tính tương thích ngược với phiên bản trước đó. NTFS Benchmarks Continuing on from yesterday's Linux 4. BtrFS RAID 6 implementation is "mostly working", see here:Since btrfs doesn't have something comparable to the ZVOL the best you can do is use subvolumes which must always use the btrfs file system. 현재 Ext4는 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6의 기본 파일 시스템으로 단일 파일 및 파일 시스템 모두에서 최대 16 TB 크기 까지 지원합니다. XFS is very well established and changing slowly, and the same can be said for EXT4. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems,. Você pode então configurar a aplicação de cotas usando uma opção de montagem. Share. It is destined to be replaced by Btrfs as the default Linux filesystem. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. XFS vs. You will see the difference especially with autosaves in Satisfactory for an example. As well as ext4. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. Linux có nhiều tùy chọn hệ thống file khác nhau. Hello everyone, The time has come again for me to reinstall arch once more. Ext4 focuses on providing a reliable and stable file system with good performance. When running PostMark, ZFS came out far ahead of the UFS file-systems being more than ten times faster than. ago. Ext4 was designed with spinning drives in mind but as SSDs are fundamentally different, an SSD optimized file system can help. Linux File System Comparison: XFS vs. mount the recently formatted btrfs partition without special options just with mount /dev/nvme0n1p2 /mnt and create the subvolumes you want, e. 1 only) xfs (RHEL 7. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. @taffer Your "recent benchmark" is from April 2015, over three years old and uses XFS with only default options. Let's go over File Systems in this video. This is why XFS might be a great candidate for an SSD. But none of these will be relevant to a bog standard use case like "browsing the internet and sometimes. Ext4 is the default file system on most Linux distributions for a reason. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. 1. It's rigid and inflexible. Running this fio command, I get about 2. Thanks again! Unless you're doing something crazy, ext4 or btrfs would both be fine. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. EXT4 had the best speed at 58MB/s while Btrfs came in slightly behind that at 52MB/s and then ZFS came in at 46MB/s. So I moved everything off of it and formatted it into XFS and ate the 0,5% space loss for peace of mind. to cut a long story short: If you want a common file storage between Unix and windows, exFAT is the best choice at the moment. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. On the other hand, EXT4 handled contended file locks about 30% faster than XFS. Currently I'm running on LVM with SSD caching and ext4 fs. Ext4 Filesystem 其實你提到一個重點了. Here are the major feature of BTFS over ext4. Btrfs is a big leap past ext4 and XFS because it supports features such as: Copy-on-write; Subvolumes, snapshots, and rollbacks; Online defragmentation(ext4 for general use, xfs for MythTV) On the other hand, I lost an entire filesystem with btrfs - the utilities couldn't identify anything on the (raid-1) drives as btrfs, it wasn't just corrupted, it went missing. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). 0-040700-generic (x86_64) Unity 7. – cas. 8 snapshot as of last week. Ext4 has some scalability and performance issues when dealing with large or fragmented files or directories. Btrfs vs Ext4. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. Just EXT4, yes. I can't make out whether this will remove hot spots when the underlying raid device changes, but a plain rebalance will rewrite the entire file system, so it looks like it will. #filesystem #ext4 #xfs #linuxExplicación de las diferencias entre sistemas de archivos, en este vídeo se comparan los 2 mas usados en GNU/Linux. This section highlights the differences when using or administering an XFS file system. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Linux 5. Hi I have used BTRFS for the first time since March 2023 on my internal archives directory. Ext4 is a journaled filesystem, which simply means that it “journals” the location of the files on the disk and keeps track of the changes on the disk. F2FS With Linux 4. use ZFS only w/ ECC RAM. Performance: Ext4 performs better in everyday tasks and is faster for small file writes. Approach 2: Readjust things so the kernel and modules are on an ext4 filesystem and the data you most want to compress is on a btrfs partition. Built By the Slant team. If you use Debian, Ubuntu, or Fedora Workstation, the installer defaults to ext4. 再將資料再回存到 NAS, 這部份會花費很多時間. ) XFS. However, the performance of ZFS on FreeBSD/PC-BSD 8. ZFS is great but heavy/complex, and lack of block pointer rewrite can be painful. g. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. In the past, I have often seen statements that EXT4 is better for gaming than XFS. . 4 was performing the best for RAID0 and RAID10 modes while with RAID1, XFS was performing the best. Following my post MySQL/ZFS Performance Update, a few people have suggested I should take a look at BTRFS (“butter-FS”, “b-tree FS”) with MySQL. Die Funktionen umfassen eine transparente Komprimierung, Prüfsummen und. To be clear, I am using RAID0 with two SSDs with strip size of 256Kb. If you think that you need. Maybe adding Btrfs compression would be negligible outside of storage benchmarks. ago. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Now I may send the snapshots also to an local device (formatted in Btrfs). one of the still “beta” features of btrfs. So I think you should have no strong preference, except to consider what you are familiar with and what is best documented. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: The question is XFS vs EXT4.